On the other hand, the high hood can be easy to grab, especially if you're riding with your forearms parallel to the road. The way the shifters work on each groupset is the biggest differentiator between the two. The calipers you get with Shimano’s 105 groupset are excellent. We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you have a frame with direct mount points, you can use the BR-7010 versions (£44.99) built to the same SLR-EV design but with two frame mounting points rather than the traditional single. Properly setup, both Shimano 105 and SRAM Rival 22 offer similar levels of performance to the top-level components from their respective manufacturers, it’s just that they’re a little heavier. If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. Rival 22 RRP: £46/£57 | Typical price: £55. Rival 22 RRP: £220 | Typical price: £126.44. – The SRAM rival is near to SHIMANO 105 groupset. I thought our deal was that I subscribe and the adverts go away. how would you explain the exact same Canyon bike now being approx £500 cheaper in Ireland than in the UK? The 105 callipers are not noticeably inferior to the Ultegra brakes in anything other than weight, and even then we're only talking about 20g here and there.". “If I had to choose one or the other, the SRAM brakes would probably edge it. Shimano’s 105 twin pivot brake callipers (below) are exceptionally good, offering loads of power and plenty of control. Both are superb brands in their own rights offering some of the best cycling components in the world. Many readers on this site are new to triathlon and may be riding road bikes instead of aero bikes. Shimano offers 105 cranks in 165, 170, 172.5 and 175mm lengths – which will cover the vast majority of people –while SRAM provides all of those plus 167.5mm and 177.5mm options. The SRAM Rival and Shimano Ultegra groupsets are designed to meet the needs of more budget-minded road cyclist. For the SRAM Rival 22 groupset, you are looking at spending $*** (check here). Essentially, the front derailleur cage rotates slightly when you shift from the small chainring to the large one, so its angle relative to the chain remains the same. We find a lot of first time buyers have been given a key piece of information for their shopping by a friend who rides - "Buy a bike with 105!" I strongly prefer the feel of shifting on the shimano gear, especially the front shifting. Therefore, whichever you choose is down to your personal preference. save hide report. The road bike hierarchy goes from Shimano 2300, to Sora, Tiagra, Shimano 105, Ultegra, and up to Dura-Ace. When it comes to weight, a short cage Shimano 105 rear derailleur weighs 225g while the SRAM Rival 22 weighs 180g. However, this does not mean the SRAM Rival 22 chainset is not a good one, and it still offers an excellent level of stiffness. 105 RRP: £49.99 | Typical price: £45.00 A short cage Shimano 105 rear derailleur weighs 225g while the SRAM Rival 22 equivalent is 45g lighter. This will also tell you whether you find the hoods of one brand more comfortable than those of the other. I own a 2011 look 566 with rival and a 2011 felt with 5700 105. We'd be interested to hear about the experiences of readers who have used both systems. Generally, an SRAM bike comes with initial RIVAL groupset. Hence, with all these advantages and disadvantages over each other, Sram Apex vs Shimano 105 shows that they are the best bikes for triathlon races to choose from with a value for money. It rules the roost on bikes priced from about £1,000. When he reviewed SRAM Rival 22, Dave Atkinson said, “It's a bit of a fiddle to set up, but once you have it dialled in it works perfectly, and I didn't have any derailleur rub at the front even when I was crossing the chain on purpose.”. I do like the hoods on the SRAM stuff better and feel they look better. I'm only trying to be clear on what the law says, not defending its wisdom. The aim of road.cc buyer's guides is to give you the most, authoritative, objective and up-to-date buying advice. Visit my cool blog: http://sickbiker.com/ HUGE bikes and components SALE: http://tidd.ly/a60a97ae If you’re choosing between Shimano 105 R7000 and SRAM Rival 22 groupsets, here’s everything you need to know in order to make the right decision. My feed has become inundated with irrelevant adverts. Respuesta 1: Desde una perspectiva de sentir, ... Shimano tiene los mejores cambios frontales en el negocio, sin duda. sram rival vs 105. sram rival vs 105. We’d suggest you try out both systems before making a buying decision, perhaps at a local bike shop, to see which you prefer. You can also find further guides on our sister sites off.road.cc and ebiketips. “Shifting is everything you'd expect: precise and repeatable across the whole cassette. This is because they give you lots of power and they are easy to modulate. The reason behind this is that when you change to a larger gear, the front derailleur cage rotates, so your chain does not rub on the side plates. The main difference you would notice is that they are heavier than their more expensive counterparts. This post might contain affiliate links for which we may make a small commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. However, the SRAM brakes have a more progressive feel and are easier to modulate. Terms and conditions of use. The 105 chainset we reviewed here on road.cc hit the scales at 737g while you’re looking at over 100g more for Rival. We’ve not had any issues with SRAM Rival 22 shifting either. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. The Shimano 105 chainset weighs 737g, while the SRAM Rival 22 is around 840g. Shimano 105 vs. Sram Rival. This makes it easier to set up, as you do not need a chain tool to break the chain. Like most sites we make a small amount of money if you buy something after clicking on one of those links. Moving with current industry trends, Shimano offers four in-series cassettes, 12-25t, 11-28t, 11-30t (new) and 11-32t. Go down to the drops and settle in for a technical descent and they're even better. If you go for a hydraulic brake system, the shifters will be a different shape because they have to incorporate a master cylinder. 2 Nov 2010 #1 Top; Hey Guys, Looking at new bikes atm, and have seen a couple which I like, with the only main difference being the … Based on testing a wide variety of options, here is what I recommend and why. Rival 22 RRP: £74 pr | Typical price: £57.99 pr. With both the Shimano and SRAM systems, you can expect precise and repeatable gear shifting. You can choose a SRAM cassette with a range of 11-36. What is SRAM Rival equivalent to? With Shimano’s design (above), you change to a larger sprocket by sweeping the brake lever inward, and you change to a smaller sprocket by pushing a lever that sits behind the brake lever. Both systems are 11-speed, but it is possible to use different cassettes for alternative gear ranges. Can you guys suggest how do they differ and which one performs better? Just make sure you get the correct bottom bracket for your choice. Our guides include links to websites where you can buy the featured products. Main Differences Between SRAM vs Shimano. We wouldn’t say that one system is inherently better than the other, but they are different. Shimano 105 is much more commonly fitted as original equipment on complete bikes than SRAM Rival 22. Shimano now offers an 11-34 cassette to give you a wider range of gears than before.Â. You can use either system with tires up to 28mm wide. One SRAM cassette covers 11-36 teeth, although you’d have to use that as part of a 1x system with a specially designed rear derailleur. I strongly prefer the feel of shifting on the shimano gear, especially the front shifting. 105 RRP: £144.99 | Typical price: £93.09 - £107.99 Explore the complete archive of reviews of groupsets on road.cc. Rival 22 shifters are about 150g lighter. I already read numerous horror stories about the Rival having clunky shifting no matter how much you tune them and the problems with the front derailleur. If braking power is at the top of your list, the Shimano 105 may be the one you want to choose. Tom Fortune has been reviewing cycling products for several years from his home in the French Alps. Shimano. I have never seen a ground anchor that that put it's loop under the concrete, looks proper effective and only to be installed during construction. The design of the Shimano 105 sees you changing to a larger gear, by flicking the brake lever inward, while flicking an additional lever behind the brake lever, puts it into a smaller gear. We’ve found the chains of both systems to be smooth and reliable, although the SRAM chain is easier to set up thanks to the inclusion of a PowerLock connecting link that doesn’t require the use of any tools. This results from what it calls ‘Yaw’ technology that has trickled down from its higher end groupsets. The performance of the two systems are pretty equal, but you may prefer how one works more than the other. This version has been completely updated to reflect the differences between Rival 22 and the newer Shimano 105 R7000 groupset. You can get the 105 chainset in a standard 53/39-tooth option, semi-compact 52/36,  compact 50/34. 105 and Rival 22 are the third tier road groupsets from their respective manufacturers. But, SRAM Rival 22 gives you the ability to alter the reach of both the brake lever and the shift paddle. You tap the paddle to change to smaller gears and push it further to select bigger gears. SRAM’s Rival 22 chainset (above) is available in 52/36, 50/34 and 46/36-tooth options. The Grind: SRAM vs Shimano gearing for gravel. Both Shimano and SRAM offer disc brake versions of 105 and Rival 22, so they automatically get extra points straight away. The weight of the cassette all depends on the one you choose, but you can expect each of them to weigh in at roughly 260g. For the R7000 version of 105, Shimano has introduced an 11-34 cassette to provide an even wider gear range, and we've found that the GS rear derailleur will even work with the 11-40 cassette Shimano makes for its mountain bike systems. 105 VS Rival Time Trial component group differences The question today is about differences in performance and maintenance with SRAM's Rival vs. Shimano 105 group sets. Shimano (above) now uses a four arm rather than a five arm spider to secure the chainrings, with uneven spacing between those arms. SRAM uses what it calls a DoubleTap mechanism. One does not have an advantage over the other, but your choice is down to personal preference. If you tell a Campagnolo snob that Rival compares to Athena you will have a … 87% Upvoted. Some think that SRAM Rival is more similar to 105 in build quality than Apex even though it's splitting hairs to compare it. © 2008–present unless otherwise stated. Thread starter chrishodges; Start date 2 Nov 2010; C. chrishodges Active Member. They're a bit more keen to squeak when they get wet, but in my experience there's less rotor rub after heating the discs up on a long descent.”. The action is pretty effortless, due to the polymer-coated cables. If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. It’s a very light action thanks to polymer coated cables. Both SRAM and Shimano make smooth and reliable chains that should not give you too much trouble. This spacing ensures that you get strength where it is needed the most. Help us to make it better. A pair of 105 R7000 brake/shift levers weighs 500g. The Shimano 105 front derailleur weighs 95g, while the SRAM Rival 22 weighs 89g with the guide to prevent the chain from coming off. You’re likely to spend a lot of your riding time with your hands resting on them. Starting right at the beginning, a groupset is a component manufacturer’s collection of mechanical parts, usually covering the derailleurs, shifters, brakes, chainset, bottom bracket, cassette and chain. Fantasy Cycling: game [at] road.cc Posted 8 years ago. SRAM also offers hydraulic rim brakes (above, £254 per wheel with brake/shift levers, though you can now pick them up for around £200) that will fit to a standard (non-disc) bike, although we can’t say we’ve seen these fitted as original equipment on any bikes.